Consider using a term your patients understand

It has been suggested that the lay verbiage of bone attack is a helpful choice over the more clinical term osteoporosis-related fragility fracture as it may facilitate communication and understanding with patients.1

In your daily practice, you may find that counselling patients about the goals and benefits of Bone Health Care Plans can be challenging.

This can be attributed, in part, to osteoporosis being the “silent thief”, since bone can deteriorate over a number of years without any symptoms.

But when physicians give voice to osteoporosis, they address the fractures associated with the disease, which the PHAC report says is the main public health challenge.

Despite osteoporosis clinical practice guidelines and the known consequences of osteoporosis, there is a major gap between guideline-recommended care and actual care. This is the osteoporosis care gap.2

Bone attack and heart attack

The PHAC report likens an osteoporotic fragility fracture to a bone attack.2

woman with cane lying on ground man with beard grasping his chest by his heart

Consider post-event care for a heart attack.

What about a bone attack?

You are now leaving the BoneAttackInOsteoporosis.ca website

The linked sites are not under the control of Amgen, and Amgen is not responsible for the content available on the linked sites. Such links do not imply Amgen's endorsement of material on any other site, and Amgen disclaims all liability with regard to your access to such linked websites. Amgen provides links to other Internet sites as a convenience to users, and access to such linked sites is at your own risk.

Do you want to link to our other external sites and leave BoneAttackInOsteoporosis.ca?

You are now leaving the BoneAttackInOsteoporosis.ca website. Please note that the information you are about to view may not comply with Canadian regulatory requirements. Marketing authorizations and availability of products may differ between Canada and other countries.